Archive for the ‘Grinds My Gears!’ Category

Hmm… Haven’t posted in a while.

Saturday, September 15th, 2007

Let’s see… What’s been pissing me off?

They banned Manhunt 2! Fucking mollycoddling bastards trying to… nah, I’ve done this. Besides, I’m just going to import it from The Netherlands. Hmmm…

Cocaine bust bullshit! How much coke? Nobody knows! They just kept pulling numbers out of their arses… then that fucking mouthpiece RTE wheels out that tired bullshit about traces of cocaine on 99 billion percent of banknotes… it’s a fine powder! The notes are stored in close prox… Hmm? Too late? Oh.

Those pictures of cats with captions underneath simply not funny! Oh, who cares…

Erm… XML shouldn’t be used for config files! They’re supposed to be human editable – I don’t want to have to parse a config! Erm… bit esoteric. Hrm…

Let’s see… teaching kids to scream for products? Ah sure, they scream anyway.

TV Dinners? ATM etiquette? Umbrellas again? Bah.

*edit* I know! Those free morning papers – they shove the most egregious of their propaganda into your head while it’s still soft and mushy from last night’s dreamyland… and so on in that fashion until paranoid conclusion reached…

Remake Fever

Tuesday, September 12th, 2006

The Hollywood machine has run out of ideas. Sure, most of the movies are bassy explosion-fests anyway but the threadbare plots which loosely tied together the series of booms, crashes and flashing lights were occasionally quite inventive. Some time in the past few years this well of talent dried up and producers started looking to the recent past for “new” films. The Wicker Man is a fantastic horror tale where Edward Woodward plays a puritannical police officer uncovering an insidious plot surrounding the disappearance of a young girl. I don’t care to see the Nicholas Cage version. For those who’ve seen the original check out the trailer and see if there’s something they DON’T give away… “Who’s the Wicker Man?!” “…believe nothing that you see or hear!” Christ, the kid on the poster even has evil eyes.

I digress… I recently caught a trailer for Children of Men which is based on a 1992 novel by PD James. I thought it was an interesting and original plot… Sure, its purpose is to string together a series of explosions and flashing lights but at least it’s not a remake! Or is it..? My brother reminded me of the 1983 Italian B Sci-Fi movie 2019 – Dopo la caduta di New York (2019: After the Fall of New York) he saw some years back. Here’s the plotline they used to tie together their particular series of explosions and flashing lights. Oh well, back to the scripting board.

Cotton wool and razor blades

Friday, February 3rd, 2006

Apparently Memoirs of a Geisha “contains moderate sex scenes and emotional intensity”. Now, I know some people believe in a man in the sky who gets pissed off if they watch people pretending to fuck and similar bullshit so they need to be cautioned, but emotional intensity? Is our culture (the term is applied in the loosest possible manner) so neutered that anything remotely approaching drama actually requires a warning? Anything that might demand more engagement than the braying of a group who know a good dick joke when they hear one requires advance notice?

*Punches self in the face* AAARRRGGGHHH! If I’m going to sit there for two hours exposing myself to someone’s artistic vision it better contain suffocating swathes of emotional intensity or I’m slicing a pound of flesh from the asshole that sold it to me with something I’ll no longer shave with. I don’t work right now (at least not for money) but when I did it was the most grey, soulless, inhuman, dull, aneurysm inducing, drool farming shit I’ve ever endured. From flipping burgers to punching characters into a terminal, the days wore me down like my skull was in a slow moving mortar and pestle. Flourescent lights burned my eyes like lye. Phones rang in my ears long into my sleeping hours. The constant, meaningless suit chattering infested my nightmares like something that would make Clive Barker shit out of his eye sockets on the spot.

After my fun day at work why would I go to see the newest wad of mung from Ben Stiller? What does the latest Nick Hornby adaptation have to offer me that I couldn’t gain by spraying a can of hairspray down my throat? When my work was over I needed a little emotional intensity to make up for the emotional loss of the working day. I wanted to consume something where the performers were somewhat involved. If I’m going to spend money that I paid for with a significant part of my fucking life it had better be so intense that by the time I’m finished experiencing it I should have a different haircut – you should be able to see the whites of my eyes in the dark. I don’t need my intellect, peanut sized as it is, shit on by some sub-kindergarten level single thread plot, flashing explosions, loud noises and jokes that might as well be the sound of a toilet flushing.

To me there’s no point in watching a movie, listening to an album, reading a book or getting into whatever artistic forms you prefer if there’s no emotional involvement. No point at all, waste of time, part of your life has expired to no end, without purpose, might as well pick up the crack pipe and kiss it all goodbye. I’m not going to tell you what to listen to, watch, read, view, go to, consume… but please, make sure you can derive some emotional intensity from it because your life is short, you only get one of them and emotion is the only experience there is.

…I won’t be seeing Memoirs of a Geisha, by the way… ;-)

Bill Hicks in Chicago

Thursday, January 12th, 2006

Well, I ditched flashblock in favour of adblock today and Google video seems to work.

Well, the most popular videos on there seem to be, for want of a better term, fucking idiotic garbage – a total waste of bandwidth. Searching around I eventually happened upon this old favourite:

Bill Hicks in Chicago is a classic. Often referred to as the “loses it” video by fans (such as myself), in this gem Bill lets loose on a particularly unpleasant member of his audience in a manner I bet other comics have wet dreams about. “Bad” language, protracted silences and general chaos enue.

This show is not for the faint of heart, people who think “drugs are bad”, people who obsess about what the neighbours think, those who buy newspapers that confirm their politics, conformists and other well behaved children.

Against You!

Wednesday, December 28th, 2005

Many of you probably won’t be aware of the DIY Ethic as a musical movement. That’s because you’re MTV addicted, consumer sheep with an attention span of a gnat on LSD ;-)

But seriously, folks… DIY and independent music has been important to me for many years. I like buying music where most of what I paid for it doesn’t go towards some suit’s cocaine debts. I like going to gigs where you can stand beside the artists, not below them. I enjoy music made for the sake of the music and not for the sake of shifting units. I will not enter into any debate on this. If you can stand listening to the whores then more power to you.

Now, recently my Against Me! T Shirt started to give me a terrible itching, burning sensation. “Hmmm?” I thought. I always think little sounds like that. Anyway, “Hmmm? Must need a wash!” So I washed it… and it still didn’t feel right. I decided to take a look around the interspluh and see if anyone else had experienced the same thing – if they were they weren’t talking about it. Quite a puzzlement – a two-pipe conundrum.

Anybleh, reading my daily web comics I see something interesting on punk-rock favourite, Nothing Nice to Say. It turns out that DIY stalwarts Against Me! have signed to a Warner Bros. subsidiary to earn for a media conglomerate and get on MTV or whatever it is people sell their souls for. I’ll let Mitch Clem of Nothing Nice take it from here because I can’t muster anything more than a middle-finger-response and the loudest “FUCK YOU” you’ve ever heard.

*edit* 1 Feb – Just listening to Zappa… Interesting track called “Drooling Midrange Accountants On Easter Hay” has the following message for the impressionable youth listening out for hints of obscenity:

Once upon a time, a record company had A&R people in it who would take a chance, make a decision, use their gut reaction, sign a group, and see what they could do with it. Okay? That was, whoa, a long time ago. It’s not that way anymore. All decisions about who get signed and what happens to the record are made by these drooling little midrange accountants. And everything is based on the numbers games in there. And the taste of the accountants is what is ruling the mass media. It’s all just the dollars and cents of exchange. And if you wanna make music that you believe in, the chances of doing it on a major label basis are nil, because they’re all so frightened. Everybody’s there trying to protect their job. And it’s easy– it’s easier to look like a wise executive by saying no to something if it’s just the most minutely fringe-oid in terms of content.

No.

The horrible part of it is the artists who are feeding this ecological chain stop making songs they believe in and start making product that they know will be airable. And they change the style of what they’re doing to fit within the narrow framework that is the contemporary accepted norm for suitable, radio-sounding music. And anything that comes outside of that norm doesn’t go on the air, you don’t hear about it, you don’t know about it. Right now there’s probably hundreds of artists in the United States making great sounds and great music. You’ll never hear it. You’ll never find out about it.

Bias bias.

Sunday, October 30th, 2005

I note a lot of the TV listings for Michael Moore’s emotionally exploitative drama documentary Fahrenheit 9/11 (which is on RTE 2 tonight) talk about the bias in the movie. Fine, but if they’re that concerned with creating this preconception in cases where there is bias on TV then why don’t we see “RTE 18:01 – News: Six One – Government sponsored mouthpiece blah blahs about some bullshit smokescreen to keep you preoccupied with irrelevancies”, “Sky News – They’ve got a new News Command Centre or something… Oooooh! Shiny things! Check out the injured brown people!” or “Channel 4 21:00 – Dispatches – Tonight’s diluted exposé delivers shocking new threadbare evidence about something to do with criminal immigrants or video games or some other bullshit that’ll have you armed with all the ‘facts’ and a throbbing vein in your temple”?

A little balance is all I’m asking for. I know the role of television is not exactly to encourage independent thought and logical analysis but I find the singling out of a specific, controversial presentation as “biased” to be at least insulting. Surely they don’t want to take away our ability to make up our own minds entirely, do they?

Umbrella season again… *sigh*

Tuesday, October 11th, 2005

“Way to keep an insignificant percentage of your body dry at the expense of my head, you fucking egomaniacal jackass.”
“Sorry!”
“Be more careful in future… Or better yet, just put the useless thing away. You’re not so important that you should be dry.”

I was smacked in the head by no less than two umbrella carriers today – I will not bore you with my ideas on the introduction of a license requirement to even get behind the wheel of an umbrella. Instead I will bore you with a couple of basic observations on the nature of the umbrella carrier:

1) The umbrella carrier is an individual who feels so precious and important that they should not be exposed to the elements when they go outdoors. They feel a microclimate should be created around their Very Important Persons that will shield them from the horrors of water exposure – horrors such as wet hair, wet shoulders and… Well, that’s about all an umbrella will prevent.

2) The size of the umbrella is directly proportional to the dimensions of the ego of the carrier. If you wish to protect your more than your head and shoulders then you’re going to need something about three times the diameter of the average person. Something that takes up about 75% of the average Dublin City Centre footpath. Something with the name of your bank on it to let people know what a valued customer you are. Something you could fit another person, if not another two people, under but won’t. Why should you? You don’t bring other people around in your 4 Wheel Drive urban assault vehicle with all the high centre-of-gravity options, why should you start ferrying underlings around under your ego shield, er… I mean totemistic affectation, er… I mean symbol of power over the pedestrian for when you can’t take to the roads and must walk amongst them.

Just buy a fucking raincoat & hat and leave me my eyes, please.

Fuck the children.

Tuesday, July 26th, 2005

Well, that’s it. I’m officially sick of parents offloading the responsibility for raising their children on electronic entertainment companies. The latest abomination in the war against tame, sub-softcore sexual references is some bullshit about porncasts… Now, I missed the boat on the whole podcast thing so I might not fully understand it, but as far as I can tell it’s audio publishing by the sort of egomaniacs who post inane drivel on so-called “blogs” (*cough*). Porncasts refer to podcasts where the subject matter is sexual. Should 8 year olds be listening to this? Probably not. Should Apple be responsible for the content of third party contributors? Fuck, no. Should you maybe peek over your little angel’s shoulder every once in a while when they’re online (as you get up to get another beer during the ad break – that’s a sensible interval)? Well jees, I think we have a solution.

You see, instead of leaving little Tommy to his own devices on the internet it might be an idea to raise him a little. Let him know you’re interested so he doesn’t become some pre-pubescent, porncast addicted delinquent. It might be an idea to implement a few filters while you’re at it. Now, I don’t agree with censorship at all – not one iota do I want to have my cultural experiences filtered through someone else’s obscenity threshold – but I’m 27 years old and the only one who uses this ‘net connection and I still have content filters. All I’m saying is, instead of letting cathode ray tubes raise your kid it might be an idea to sit down and talk to the little proto-you. You can’t just sit them down in front of the closest convenient screen while you get on with your life – you have responsibilities which preclude having a life and these responsibilities need to have things explained to them every once in a while. Hell, if you weren’t willing to give up everything for little sproggy then maybe you shouldn’t have spat him out, k?

But that’s not what pisses me off. The state of the next generation is not my concern… When you get to a certain age all kids are rotten and whether it’s true or not doesn’t really matter. The problem is your kids have a profound enough effect on my life already. Part of my wage pays for their education – this shit should be limited to those inconsiderate enough to be spewing new humans in the first place. Driving them around (and they go around a lot – school, sport, whatever) every day clogs up the air (and I already have asthma, Poolbeg and some stinky water treatment plant to deal with… and they’ve not even built the incinerator yet… Hey, guess what! It already smells like shit around here without it smelling like garbage too…) and the extra jeeps an the road frustrate honest people trying to get to work and make a contribution. And there’s a thing… all I need when I’m out walking in the morning is some half asleep Killiney dimwit (or even thousands of half asleep Killiney dimwits) blasting through my town in a vehicle designed for hunting mountain goats. I’m vulnerable enough crossing the road as it is without some punch-drunk parent careening towards me in a thing designed to hit me in the head. Honestly, I’ve watched these people… your average 19 year old Honda Civic owner is a veritable driving instructor when compared to some of the Ayrton Sennas belting around the town in the mornings. God damn, why do all the most prestigious, abusive schools have to be situated to take them past my house?

That’s not the half of it, though… Children annoy me. I mean really irritate the hell out of me. Your kids have the same effect as a dentist’s drill on my unanaesthetised jaw. “Well, why don’t you just avoid them?” I can’t. They’re everywhere. Everywhere! If I leave the house at the wrong time of day (close as I can figure it, about 3pm but it varies) I’m going home with a headache and my teeth ground down to the gumline… and that’s just during the good months (you know, autumn and winter). During the summer, when I’m trying my best to stay composed in terperatures of up to 25 fucking degrees, they’re just everywhere all day every day. I think the schools should hand out massive homework assignments for the summer holidays… something to keep their little minds working overtime for the 10-12 whatever weeks they’d usually be under my feet doing their best impressions of dog whistles.

Also, I gave up watching TV. Just plain quit. You know why? Because 24 hours a day it beams the dullest, blandest, most inoffensive, unamusing shit into people’s heads. Now, I can’t put all the blame for all of this on the children… some people are just letter-writing subnormals who wish to retain some child-like innocence long into their 80s. Sure, there’s the watershed there to make sure that everything on before your average bedtime (being about 1am these days) is safe and doesn’t allude to anything below the neck or above the feet… I could just give it up during those hours, but then there’s these “save the children” types. Every time someone says anything stronger than “nipple” on the box you get this small, smarmy army of letter writing freaks who have nothing better to do but complain about something on TV which offended them or might have been shown at an inappropriate time for children – even if it was on at 4am… You know, these people who don’t seem to know that they can just change the channel or even better, just turn the fucking thing off and read a book! Not The Bible, though… very violent, full of sex and nobody to complain to about it. “Think of the children!” No, fuck the children.

Fuck ‘em. Sick of them. Don’t want to hear about your children. You see, when I get home after a day of hearing, hearing about, being careful around, nearly being killed by and generally trying to avoid your children I like to sit down to something a bit ribald. Or violent. Or political. Or whatever… It’s my business. But now you want to take that away from me in case junior catches a peek while you’re not parenting them? Well, fine… I don’t think it matters any more because my entire head just exploded. I don’t care any more. Take it… Take the world and wrap it in cotton wool… just don’t come crying over here when junior is completely maladjusted and incapable of dealing with anything in life. I don’t want to know when there’s a generation of half-wits who don’t know how to fuck, fight or laugh. Please don’t tell me when there’s an employment crisis after a whole generation appears who can’t tie a knot but work well with velcro if they can watch an instructional video simultaneously because you know what I’ll say? “Fuck ‘em”.

Just a final note… Your children are stronger than you think. They lack a lot of the preconceptions you have which make it hard for you to accept things. They’ll see a corpse and get on with their day… “la la la!” Or they might hear a lot of words they don’t understand and file them away or better yet, ask you about them. They don’t need all the details, just something to fit it into their frame of reference. I remember when I was very young I heard about a rape on the news. “What’s a rape?” “It’s a very violent crime.” Enough for me… Got on with my day. The fact that I had some basic idea of what rape was didn’t fuck up my youth or my innocence… I believe I went out and played on the street that evening same as any other. Also, if you take any of this to heart or are offended by any of it then relax… you’re taking it too seriously.

Hot Coffee for the logic deprived.

Thursday, July 21st, 2005

For those of you who’ve had their heads under a rock for the past several years or are just too young/old, the Grand Theft Auto series of games are some classic cartoon crime capers where you play various villains in various backdrops trying to attain wealth and power. In its latest incarnation, GTA:San Andreas, you play a gangsta rap style crim who rolls with his homies, performs the occasional drive-by, eats fast food, wears garments of a certain colour and so on.

Recently a mod (modificaton) appeared on the interbleh which allowed you to perform a sex scene with your virtual girlfriend. This has caused a bit of a stir in the good ol’ US of A where puritannical views are the norm and what you do in the bedroom is subject to the closest scrutiny just in case you’re pissing off some God character from a song their kids are forced to sing every morning – or at least that’s my understanding of it. I’ve been known to miss the point when it comes to this sort of thing. Even Hilary Clinton’s got her oar in, although the idea of extramarital sexual activity being uncomfortable to her might be understandable.

It took me a while to get this situation straight in my head… This is a game where you can, if the mood takes you, go on a cop-killing rampage, beating up a few prostitutes and old ladies along the way just for the fuck of it… You learn to beat people up more efficiently at the gym with different combos of button bashing. You can pick up a few gang members, steal a car and go on drive by shooting sprees in random neighbourhoods but, correct me if I’m wrong here, the game becomes too extreme when the protagonist makes love to his girlfriend? Is this the gist of what’s going on here?

Well now, that doesn’t make a lick of sense. Could this just be the convenient scapegoat the censorship fanatics have been looking for over the past decade or so? Ever since DooM (you remember, that low res, comedy, gore ‘em up where you blasted holes in pink/purple/red, squishy looking demons with physics defying weapons) became a training camp for everyone with a heavy metal CD the logic deprived have been chomping at the bit to exercise some control over the whole video game thing. It’s nothing new – they’ve been doing the same with music for a long time (although that’s calmed down a lot since they gained control of that whole thing anyway, adding it to their catalogue of other Hollywood monstrosities like movies and television. I still remember these guys getting Ozzy Osbourne and Judas Priest records and playing them backwards to hear what Satan had to say and no amount of The Darkness, Blink 182 or whatever else passes for rock music these days is going to make me forget. I like my theatrics and posturing with a little edge).

Well, they got their wish. It’s effectively no longer on the shelves in the Land of the Free until a new version is mastered where you’ll just have to blow the heads of twice as many cops in a futile attempt to relieve that sexual tension.

*edit – 25 July* Oh, it gets better. Well known kook Jack Thompson has launched an attack on The Sims 2 (you know, that tame life-em-up for those with no lives?), railing against its full frontal nudity, including nipples, penises, labia, and pubic hair. I think Mr. Thompson has some serious problems that I’m not going to even begin to speculate on.

Know this, web designers…

Monday, July 11th, 2005

If you create a site which makes ANY noise then you’d better invest in a pair of asbestos undies because you will burn in the eternal fires of hell where imps will nibble at your extremities and bugs will crawl in and out of your facial orifices. I don’t care if it’s a “blip” as my cursor rolls over your gratuitous Macromedia Flash buttons or a song playing on your shitty band’s webpage… You are evil and your eternal reward has been revoked.

You see, I listen to music on my computer… I’ve spent hundreds of hours capturing my vinyl, tapes and CDs to the hard disk so I can conveniently pump out some tunes with a click of the mouse or a tap of a few keys at the terminal. If you interrupt that in any manner then you have detracted from this convenience for no good reason and you’ve just lost yourself a visitor. I’ve almost considered installing a poorer quality sound card which can’t play audio from more than one PCM source because of you fucks.

I would remove the plugins which intrude on my space but… Well, here it is. Web designers who needlessly embed content, links or any other functional elements in applets/plugins are doomed to the same fate as those who force me to hear shit I do not want to hear. I have proprietary garbage infesting my browser’s stability all because you can’t be arsed to learn HTML other than <embed src>… Eternal flames, imps with the teeth and the gnashing, weird bugs and Slayer album covers await you.

Notes:

  • I am an atheist. I am currently tendering for construction companies to build “Web Designer Hell”.
  • I do not download music so untwist your undies, IRMA. Major label music sucks Satan’s cock. Atheist and all that, so I am currently tendering for construction companies to build “Satan’s Cock for Commercial Bands to Suck On”.

Relax, Cory… it may just be a mistake.

Tuesday, June 28th, 2005

Just reading this boingboing.net post… Now, I’m as guilty of employing empty rhetoric in my screeds as the next irresponsible dweller of what is irritatingly referred to as the “blogosphere”, but this is some prime emotive wailing.

In amongst the indignant retelling of the struggle of the small pubisher against censorship the following line screams at me: “…users of Surfcontrol’s paying customers will be walled off from Boing Boing the same way that Chinese and Iranian citizens are prevented from seeing parts of the Internet due to the judgements of unaccountable authorities in those countries.”

…and there was me thinking Surfcontrol’s customers chose to employ a web filter, but no. Apparently Surfcontrol Ltd. is some sort of dictatorship depriving people of access to the truth against their will. Who knew?

Now, correct me if I’m wrong here but hasn’t boingboing.net linked to materials in the past which some might refer to as ribald? A recent post regarding a “Walt Disney Memorial Orgy” springs to mind. Now, while maladjusted people like myself nudge friends in the ribs at the sight of such an image it must be stated that it’s not for everybody. You might call these people prudes living in a Victorian self denial but you can’t deny their right to control what they see, even if that involves “censorware”.

Just to be clear, state enforced censorship boils my blood (I bought the T shirt) but if someone doesn’t want to see the 7 Dwarfs raping Snow White then I think they’re within their rights not to visit boingboing.net and I’m unsure about whether or not boingboing.net’s inclusion on Surfcontrol’s shit list is a simple clerical error. I can only guess the 24 hours mentioned in the post is employed in checking the site over for the sort of content which paying customers wish to block – I mean, it’d be a pretty lousy service if all it took was a phone call to get your website off the list.

Tantrum or hissy-fit?

Friday, June 24th, 2005

In a shock development today, it was revealed overweight cult leader Oprah Winfrey was refused entry to a classy, yet closed for business, Paris boutique. Everybody, “Aaaawwwww!”

She could have handled it with a little class but instead she acts like it’s Mississippi, 1964. Listen, bitch… you lost all your reality privileges when you started earning 100 million a year. Trust me, black women in America don’t often struggle with the problem of flying to Paris and dealing with the massive humiliation of having to spend thousands upon thousands of dollars in a different store to the one they originally intended. The struggle for equality rarely finds itself fought in such esoteric territory.

Let’s hope she steers clear of such poor-taste outbursts in future… I have a vein that’s just about to go here.

Paranoid brain-fart #416

Friday, June 17th, 2005

Overpopulation problem? Bullshit. Prove there are 6.5 billion people in the world. Within my lifetime that figure was 4.5 billion. 2 billion people in 25 years? Pull the other one… This is the AIDS generation, we’re using more contraceptives than ever before.

I think the “overpopulation problem” has some surprises in store. Maw, git the gun. ;)

Political post #2

Saturday, May 21st, 2005

This is intended as an explanation of why I don’t usually involve myself in politics.

In days of old before government in its current form existed we had feudalism, monarchies, empires, dictatorships, the occasional democracy and various other forms of population control. Then came Freud. Freud told frightening tales of the nature of humanity and the destructive tendencies of man’s libidinous desires. This happened to coincide with the formative years of international superpowers. The governments of the day (mainly in Europe and the US) felt there was a need to control or channel these tendencies of emotion in directions which would be beneficial to all. This involved a combination of offsetting natural desires with material ones (this is why Sprite adverts today have nipples) and controlling social will with parental instinct (this is why tabloids/government campaigns refer a lot to “the children”. Anyone remember the Nice referendum poster sprinkled around the country about two or three years ago which featured a gun pointing at a young girl’s head?)

The thing is, people generally don’t like being told how to live their lives. This is where democracy comes in. The original democracy an Athens was a forum where citizens turned up and had their say. Thousands of people would arrive and make sure their voice was heard on various policies. In such a system whoever implements the decisions doesn’t really matter as all decisions are made by the people. There was a major flaw in the democracy of Athens – no say for slaves, women or anyone who couldn’t afford a ticket. Well, it looks like democracy was a method of implementing the will of rich males. Fast forward to today where practically everyone has a vote, but nobody really has any say in the day to day decisions made apart from the mostly rich, mostly male “representatives”. Different method, same effect. Democracy today is merely a handy way of allowing people to harbour the delusion that they’re in control of what goes on while having things completely beyond their control happen instead. When there is a referendum on a decision the will of the people is manipulated with emotive arguments which pander to instinct rather than appeal to the intellect.

Anyway, back to Freud. During and after the First World War people had stark images of the dark side of humanity. There were two problems with this image. The first is it was seen as something new because it was the first war where cameras were really ubiquitous. The second is that war isn’t a reflection of the dark side of people themselves, but the dark side of political will. People were fighting because of things beyond their control, but as far as the actual combatants were concerned both sides were duped into believing there was a greater good being served. (Our history tells us that the good and righteous prevailed and while that may be true it seems a little hollow knowing that history is written by the winners. If the other side prevailed our history lessons would still be awash with tales of the brave victors fighting for good and righteousness.) Freud exploited these dark images to legitimise his assertion that the baser desires, what he called the id, could explode and cause a domino effect of chaos and misrule.

Political leaders, feeling a need to implement a world order where such destruction was no longer possible, turned to this psychoanalytical idealism as a means to prevent everything from war to rioting while conveniently omitting from their calculations the fact that the source of unrest was the decisions of the politicians themselves (or perhaps they knew this only too well and sought a way to exercise their will without the danger of uprisings.) Freud’s theories made it possible to refine propaganda to a point where it seemed that every policy of the government could be deemed just and right purely on the merit that it was the government the people elected who came up with it. If the government was wrong then the people must be wrong. You don’t want to be wrong, do you? Now, we’re working in the interest of you and your family so don’t worry about it!

Around this time Freud’s theories were also being employed in another area, the relatively new field of public relations. It was found that the id could be used in ways to turn sexual desire or emotional impulse into a craving for material goods by associating those goods with an aspect of sexuality or personal fulfillment. These techniques are no more advanced today than they were early last century. From the attractive woman lying on the bonnet of the Ferrari Jizzmobile 5000 to the wholesome male figure transporting his family in the Toyota Safetycage to the oppressed yet cheery woman blasting everything smaller than the pets with Domestos Kill-em-all the methods remain exactly the same. The area of public relations marketing was found to be so powerful it was often usurped by government to bend the will of the people to the will of those in power. This has generally manifested itself as tabloid campaigns in support of whatever atrocity the government found itself involved in. The circumstances surrounding the toppling of the government in Guatemala in 1954 and Iraq in 2003 were essentially the same (except in the latter case it was oil and an entire country to build on, not fruit which was the prize). The press coverage was much the same in both situations. There are bad people in charge there, the heroic will of the people of this great state must get rid of them to help the downtrodden population. Whether or not the population was downtrodden is pretty irrelevant in both cases. The fact is the will of the people was influenced very easily by pandering to emotional/social needs and the conquering nation (or the corporations behind their actions) escaped with the spoils.

As a means of preventing social chaos the governments of today are abject failures who have merely accelerated our journey towards oblivion. They assumed the role of saviours but led us into mass destruction. The problem is it has gone too far. The general public have become little more than automatons, consuming both products and the news of the day. Both will be discarded just as quickly leaving behind a trail of faeces, plastic packaging and ill-informed opinion. Even if tomorrow the people realised they were being lied to in every aspect of their daily lives those in power have vast armies at their disposal (trust me, even if they had to kill 51% of the population to maintian the status quo the order would be given without at eyelid batted and the 49% of cud-chewing, impulse-driven creatures who remained would be grateful.) There are even bulldogs at the gates in the form of vicious police who’ll club you around the head, arrest you and then get someone else to talk to you to keep even the smallest disturbances out of precious suburbia, where the real people live. You know, the rich males who make the actual decisions on the future direction of our doomed society.

Note: Do not take this post too seriously – it is not a political or psychological paper but merely my perspective on the nature of government. If you feel anger or indignation about anything I’ve said then you’re taking it with more gravity than I wrote it – it’s an early morning drunken screed and may even become a “work-in-progress”. Comments are welcome!

Political Post #1

Wednesday, May 18th, 2005

I don’t usually get into the interminable antics of those who exercise power, but occasionally an interesting contrast arises which highlights the fact that very few of those who represent us actually have a clue what they’re at. In the past while there have been some issues with Fianna Fail TDs making arses of themselves, or exposing their outdated jingoism (I think it’s faily obvious if you listen to his remarks that he wasn’t referring to Gama workers themselves as kebabs, but it’s still a cultural reference without depth or insight. The comment was still pretty ill advised – like calling me a spud-eating mick, not that that bothers me. The matter at hand is the glib manner with which Lenihan treats an important labour and rights issue). It’s startling that these people are allowed speak, let alone make decisions… I mean, in a diluted representative democracy like Ireland we have to trust the judgment of these people to make decisions on our behalf. If their judgment tells them that the first thing which should be associated with exploited workers is a kebab or that it’d be a capital idea to go on a pissed up rampage with one and a half tonnes of metal, plastic and rubber then I can’t say I’m all that confident about the quality of anything else such fevered imaginations produce. It wouldn’t be so bad for them if there wasn’t the likes of Joe Higgins around actually trying to act on behalf of those who would have otherwise have gone ignored – this only highlights their ignorance. I know this isn’t directly relevant, but I watched George Galloway in the US Senate yesterday – the word which sprang to mind was “cojones”! I mean, it takes balls to stand up in front of the slimey creeps who run the world with a warped foreign policy and attack everything that policy stands on. Don’t be surprised if he disappears in the middle of the night… ;-)

The sad fact is, that breed of political representative is a rare one and we’ll have more of the ilk of McDaid and Lenihan before any with an ounce of integrity or courage turn up.

While we’re on the day’s events I’d like to say that PETA can suck on my ass. I’m a vegetarian – I have my reasons – and I’d just like to make it clear that these people do not represent me, my views or my interests. They use shock tactics where simply offering information would be more appropriate. I’ll try to get a link for this story later on, but some of you will know I’m referring to their stunt outside a Dublin secondary school earlier today.

*edit* Sorry – this is the best I can come up with. Expect some indignant tabloid posturing and mouth breathers saying “becoz of dat I’m goin’ to KFC fer me lunch” on 5-7 Live tomorrow…