<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woot &#8211; a working VoIP config !</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.linux.ie/frankly/2005/09/27/woot-a-working-voip-config/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.linux.ie/frankly/2005/09/27/woot-a-working-voip-config/</link>
	<description>The random thoughts, links and general meanderings of Proinnsias</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHOTONIC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.linux.ie/frankly/2005/09/27/woot-a-working-voip-config/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>PHOTONIC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.linux.ie/frankly/2005/09/27/woot-a-working-voip-config/#comment-632</guid>
		<description>Hello Pron glad to see you got your 3000 working you might want to look at the vonage pap2 units as well. I have tried both now and the pap2&#039;s seem to have better voice quality. PS. don&#039;t mention Mr. Bush Wolf might be listening!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Pron glad to see you got your 3000 working you might want to look at the vonage pap2 units as well. I have tried both now and the pap2&#8242;s seem to have better voice quality. PS. don&#8217;t mention Mr. Bush Wolf might be listening!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
