Comments on: callcatcher revisited http://blogs.linux.ie/caolan/2006/04/03/callcatcher-revisited/ babblings! Sun, 19 May 2013 06:08:30 +0100 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: Pavel Roskin http://blogs.linux.ie/caolan/2006/04/03/callcatcher-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-1110 Pavel Roskin Wed, 12 Apr 2006 03:14:15 +0000 http://blogs.linux.ie/caolan/2006/04/03/callcatcher-revisited/#comment-1110 Caolan, I really appreciate your work on OOo for x86_64. I'm using your build on my system. It's working great. It's very fast. I use it for serious stuff. I remember maybe in the days of FC3 somebody wrote that OOo for x86_64 is not to be expected soon, maybe in FC6 or so. It sounded like far far in the future. Now FC6 is being worked on, and the native OOo is still not in the fedora-devel repository. I believe it's about time that the native OOo is pushed to fedora-devel. The only way to iron out bugs in this large project is to ask users for help. Those using fedora-devel are ready to help. They are prepared to deal with breakage. They want the next FC release to be the best. Please don't let another Fedora Core to be released with 32-bit-only OOo. Caolan,

I really appreciate your work on OOo for x86_64. I’m using your build on my system. It’s working great. It’s very fast. I use it for serious stuff.

I remember maybe in the days of FC3 somebody wrote that OOo for x86_64 is not to be expected soon, maybe in FC6 or so. It sounded like far far in the future. Now FC6 is being worked on, and the native OOo is still not in the fedora-devel repository.

I believe it’s about time that the native OOo is pushed to fedora-devel. The only way to iron out bugs in this large project is to ask users for help. Those using fedora-devel are ready to help. They are prepared to deal with breakage. They want the next FC release to be the best.

Please don’t let another Fedora Core to be released with 32-bit-only OOo.

]]>