<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ghosts in DTubes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.linux.ie/balor/2009/04/26/ghosts-in-dtubes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.linux.ie/balor/2009/04/26/ghosts-in-dtubes/</link>
	<description>We eat cats whilst you code.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:31:11 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: balor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.linux.ie/balor/2009/04/26/ghosts-in-dtubes/comment-page-1/#comment-58545</link>
		<dc:creator>balor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 07:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.linux.ie/balor/?p=270#comment-58545</guid>
		<description>The underlying technologies all work on Windows. So once we have something stable I&#039;ll provide a Windows port.  The usual caveats apply though; if you&#039;re using an existing photo collection management tool that doesn&#039;t let you have access to the database then you&#039;ll have to ask your provider for a tool that does similar.  Some companies won&#039;t comply because either (a) you don&#039;t matter, or (b) it would undercut their business model.  This is why I think open source has better long-term value.  Firstly, you own all your data and secondly you&#039;re always in a position to take advantage of new technologies without getting the permission/development time from the original provider.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The underlying technologies all work on Windows. So once we have something stable I&#8217;ll provide a Windows port.  The usual caveats apply though; if you&#8217;re using an existing photo collection management tool that doesn&#8217;t let you have access to the database then you&#8217;ll have to ask your provider for a tool that does similar.  Some companies won&#8217;t comply because either (a) you don&#8217;t matter, or (b) it would undercut their business model.  This is why I think open source has better long-term value.  Firstly, you own all your data and secondly you&#8217;re always in a position to take advantage of new technologies without getting the permission/development time from the original provider.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asher</title>
		<link>http://blogs.linux.ie/balor/2009/04/26/ghosts-in-dtubes/comment-page-1/#comment-58527</link>
		<dc:creator>asher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.linux.ie/balor/?p=270#comment-58527</guid>
		<description>Sounds a cool tool. Wish it was ready to run on Windows :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds a cool tool. Wish it was ready to run on Windows <img src='http://blogs.linux.ie/balor/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
