<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Competitive advantage in Open Source</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.linux.ie/balor/2006/02/14/competitive-advantage-in-open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.linux.ie/balor/2006/02/14/competitive-advantage-in-open-source/</link>
	<description>We eat cats whilst you code.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:31:11 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bart B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.linux.ie/balor/2006/02/14/competitive-advantage-in-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Bart B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.linux.ie/balor/2006/02/14/competitive-advantage-in-open-source/#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Another major advantage of being able to tinker with the innerds of FOSS code is that you can mix and match different apps to get a killer app that does something very specific.

I&#039;ll give an example, I am planning a killer, highly customised web portal for a group of astronomers, they want Wiki, Bulletin Boards, galleries with special astronomical metadata for the images and a few other things. If I user all FOSS I should be able to have one login system and tie it in to a BB system, a gallery system and a Wiki and also tweak each of the separate apps so it does exactly what we need. This gives me one highly customised killer app out of a collection of three or four FOSS apps from different people/companies. You just can&#039;t do that with closed source software!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another major advantage of being able to tinker with the innerds of FOSS code is that you can mix and match different apps to get a killer app that does something very specific.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll give an example, I am planning a killer, highly customised web portal for a group of astronomers, they want Wiki, Bulletin Boards, galleries with special astronomical metadata for the images and a few other things. If I user all FOSS I should be able to have one login system and tie it in to a BB system, a gallery system and a Wiki and also tweak each of the separate apps so it does exactly what we need. This gives me one highly customised killer app out of a collection of three or four FOSS apps from different people/companies. You just can&#8217;t do that with closed source software!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
